The ABA Journal is reporting that a straight couple in the United Kingdom is suing for the right to be granted a civil union rathter than a traditional wedding. They have apparently been refused this right because they are not a same-sex couple.
Full article is here.
It’s an interesting concept and one worth following.
What do you think? Can only gay couples be allowed civil unions?

It seems inevitable that a lawsuit like this will be coming to our shores sooner or later. It should be interesting to see what happens. If it exposes the hypocrisy of this "separate but equal" system we've got now, maybe it will help the cause of marriage equality, and ultimately be for the best.
Posted by: SFJD | November 17, 2010 at 03:54 PM
Straight couples should be given the same rights as same sex couples. Same sex couples campaign for same legal rights as hetro couples yet now in the UK they have more rights. Crazy situation.
Posted by: Maryland family lawyer | November 20, 2010 at 01:24 PM
No, I don't think gay couples should be the only ones who can be granted civil unions, and I don't think that heterosexual couples should be the only ones allowed to enter into marriages. As it says in your post, marriage and civil unions provide most of the same benefits, so if they are so similar why should it matter if the couple is straight or gay? COuples should be able to choose whichever they are more comfortable with. Also, with the divorce rate being what it is, you have to question just how seriously most straight couples view the institution of marriage (this is not to say that all divorces occur based on trivial or avoidable circumstances). My point is that there are so many gay couples who believe in the institution of marriage strongly enough to fight for the laws to be changed, and it seems like a no brainer that they should be granted this right! Same with the couple you discuss in your article!
Posted by: Michaela | December 10, 2010 at 12:25 AM
This issue of gay marriage I think that from a legal point of view should not be provided, although cohabitation is their right. They can live together, but not necessarily marriage.
Posted by: gucci shoes | December 12, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Isn't our world changing! When did we ever think this would be an issue!!
Michael C. Craven
Chicago Divorce lawyer
Posted by: Michael C. Craven | February 02, 2011 at 05:04 PM
It's okay to engage civil union. At least it has legality in courts and in front of the presiding judge. It's also a form of commitment.
Posted by: Jess | February 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM
My friendS told me that this blog is competitive. i will continue to read.
http://www.nfljerseysmalls.com
Posted by: discount jerseys | June 05, 2011 at 06:22 AM
I think that from a legal point of view should not be provided, although cohabitation is their right. They can live together, but not necessarily marriage.
Posted by: wordpress premium themes | July 13, 2011 at 04:48 PM
Whether straight or gay, we all deserve equal rights. Great post, enjoyed reading.
Posted by: Divorce Lawyer | August 22, 2011 at 02:35 AM
Being refused their simple rights because they are not a same-sex couple is unfortunate. Things may change over time though.
Posted by: San Jose Divorce Lawyer | September 02, 2011 at 11:34 PM
Mostly I don’t come up with upon blogging sites, but I want to say that this document extremely asked others to do this! Who would have thought, fairly wonderful provide.
Posted by: Moncler Jackets Sale | October 06, 2011 at 02:09 AM
measurement is three inches. Odd but correct. I purchased some elevating
Posted by: Nike Shoe Sales | October 17, 2011 at 10:25 PM
It's very appreciate that you made a such a piece of paper. Where can find such articles ? This week, I want to be a discussion about this, I am looking for information about this.
Posted by: burberry | October 22, 2011 at 02:40 AM
I'm still learning from you, but I'm trying to achieve my goals. I certainly enjoy reading all that is posted on your blog.Keep the information coming. I loved it! Thanks for you sharing..,
Posted by: Coach Outlet | October 28, 2011 at 12:01 AM
Really, it seems like in the eyes of the government, everyone should have only civil unions. Leave marriage to the church if the big picture is religion.
In the end, whether gay or straight couples are allowed to be married or enter civil unions doesn't effect anyone other than those being denied that right.
Posted by: Derek | November 24, 2011 at 08:13 PM
Law makers need to create a simpler form of marriage for couples who want to commit but who do not want to lock into a traditional marriage - civil union might be the answer.
Posted by: Tulsa Divorce Attorney | November 25, 2011 at 05:02 PM
This seems like it is a publicity stunt.
Posted by: Accident Lawyer RI | January 06, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Wow none of these comments even have anything to do with the law. I wanted to pingback to your blog about a blog post I wrote but I don't know how to do it. Here is the website.
www.utahfamilymeditation.com
Posted by: Utah divorce lawyer | January 21, 2012 at 03:26 AM
Hi, the article is so wonderful, I am interested in it. I will pay attention to your articles.
Posted by: china wholesale | February 09, 2012 at 10:22 PM