The ABA Journal is reporting that a straight couple in the United Kingdom is suing for the right to be granted a civil union rathter than a traditional wedding. They have apparently been refused this right because they are not a same-sex couple.
Full article is here.
It’s an interesting concept and one worth following.
What do you think? Can only gay couples be allowed civil unions?

It seems inevitable that a lawsuit like this will be coming to our shores sooner or later. It should be interesting to see what happens. If it exposes the hypocrisy of this "separate but equal" system we've got now, maybe it will help the cause of marriage equality, and ultimately be for the best.
Posted by: SFJD | November 17, 2010 at 03:54 PM
Straight couples should be given the same rights as same sex couples. Same sex couples campaign for same legal rights as hetro couples yet now in the UK they have more rights. Crazy situation.
Posted by: Maryland family lawyer | November 20, 2010 at 01:24 PM
No, I don't think gay couples should be the only ones who can be granted civil unions, and I don't think that heterosexual couples should be the only ones allowed to enter into marriages. As it says in your post, marriage and civil unions provide most of the same benefits, so if they are so similar why should it matter if the couple is straight or gay? COuples should be able to choose whichever they are more comfortable with. Also, with the divorce rate being what it is, you have to question just how seriously most straight couples view the institution of marriage (this is not to say that all divorces occur based on trivial or avoidable circumstances). My point is that there are so many gay couples who believe in the institution of marriage strongly enough to fight for the laws to be changed, and it seems like a no brainer that they should be granted this right! Same with the couple you discuss in your article!
Posted by: Michaela | December 10, 2010 at 12:25 AM
This issue of gay marriage I think that from a legal point of view should not be provided, although cohabitation is their right. They can live together, but not necessarily marriage.
Posted by: gucci shoes | December 12, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Isn't our world changing! When did we ever think this would be an issue!!
Michael C. Craven
Chicago Divorce lawyer
Posted by: Michael C. Craven | February 02, 2011 at 05:04 PM
It's okay to engage civil union. At least it has legality in courts and in front of the presiding judge. It's also a form of commitment.
Posted by: Jess | February 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM
My friendS told me that this blog is competitive. i will continue to read.
http://www.nfljerseysmalls.com
Posted by: discount jerseys | June 05, 2011 at 06:22 AM
I think that from a legal point of view should not be provided, although cohabitation is their right. They can live together, but not necessarily marriage.
Posted by: wordpress premium themes | July 13, 2011 at 04:48 PM
Whether straight or gay, we all deserve equal rights. Great post, enjoyed reading.
Posted by: Divorce Lawyer | August 22, 2011 at 02:35 AM
Being refused their simple rights because they are not a same-sex couple is unfortunate. Things may change over time though.
Posted by: San Jose Divorce Lawyer | September 02, 2011 at 11:34 PM
Mostly I don’t come up with upon blogging sites, but I want to say that this document extremely asked others to do this! Who would have thought, fairly wonderful provide.
Posted by: Moncler Jackets Sale | October 06, 2011 at 02:09 AM
measurement is three inches. Odd but correct. I purchased some elevating
Posted by: Nike Shoe Sales | October 17, 2011 at 10:25 PM
It's very appreciate that you made a such a piece of paper. Where can find such articles ? This week, I want to be a discussion about this, I am looking for information about this.
Posted by: burberry | October 22, 2011 at 02:40 AM
I'm still learning from you, but I'm trying to achieve my goals. I certainly enjoy reading all that is posted on your blog.Keep the information coming. I loved it! Thanks for you sharing..,
Posted by: Coach Outlet | October 28, 2011 at 12:01 AM
Really, it seems like in the eyes of the government, everyone should have only civil unions. Leave marriage to the church if the big picture is religion.
In the end, whether gay or straight couples are allowed to be married or enter civil unions doesn't effect anyone other than those being denied that right.
Posted by: Derek | November 24, 2011 at 08:13 PM
Law makers need to create a simpler form of marriage for couples who want to commit but who do not want to lock into a traditional marriage - civil union might be the answer.
Posted by: Tulsa Divorce Attorney | November 25, 2011 at 05:02 PM
This seems like it is a publicity stunt.
Posted by: Accident Lawyer RI | January 06, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Wow none of these comments even have anything to do with the law. I wanted to pingback to your blog about a blog post I wrote but I don't know how to do it. Here is the website.
www.utahfamilymeditation.com
Posted by: Utah divorce lawyer | January 21, 2012 at 03:26 AM
Hi, the article is so wonderful, I am interested in it. I will pay attention to your articles.
Posted by: china wholesale | February 09, 2012 at 10:22 PM
I think the question is: why is government even involved in deciding who gets married? We have lots of co-ownership laws, child support laws, etc.
Posted by: Will Beaumont | March 07, 2012 at 03:06 PM
Your last sentence to the qtiuseon should seal the deal.Divorce the man.A lot of factors play into this save the marriage' speech.He cheated on you for 2 years and did you find this out just recently? Let's say he wants to save the marriage. Is it worth the mental torture to wonder where he's at, what he's doing, is he really where he says he is, is he really working late, is he at her house? Believe me you may want to save this marriage as well but the after effects of infidelity lingers on. Once trust is broken, it is near to impossible to fix.Let's say he's legit about wanting to stop this affair and work on the marriage. You want proof that the affair has ended, so you call the other woman. What if she lies and says she still sees him? Some women are like that. They are scandolous that way. Who do you believe?He did this to you for 2 years. I suggest you pick up what dignity he has left you (if any) and gather up your self respect and get out of this marriage. You deserve better than what he is giving you. Hold your head up high and know that he lost a good thing.DON'T WASTE ANYMORE OF YOUR LIFE!
Posted by: Dbazz | April 26, 2012 at 11:29 AM
You allready know the ansewr to your question. If you don't trust him which in my opinon you shouldn't if you try to save your marriage it will be for all the wrong reasons and you will resent him, Once the trust is gone you honestly can't ever get it back especially the way it once was.Just remember to be careful, I know you've known your EX for a long time yet leaving a relationship to jump right into another one is tricky. If you decide to go back to your EX Take some time for yourself first, A short breather starting a new relationship. It's always a good thing to do.Good Luck with whatever you decide.
Posted by: Rikki | April 26, 2012 at 02:46 PM
Couples should be given a choice because for sure, they are the ones who really know what's best for them.
Posted by: Roxy| Lawyer Jenkintown Pa | June 06, 2012 at 07:31 PM
It has been a concern to your blog . Made a great improvement to your blog , richer content , writing style has changed dramatically . But you still remains for the readers to share valuable knowledge and theoretical information . Thank you for your sharing, I will continue to pay attention to your blog updates .
Posted by: Coach Outlet Online | July 07, 2012 at 02:41 AM
You need to make a conscious dsiceion as to how you deal with the pain of your divorce. You need to realize that how you react to what is happening in your life will have an effect on the people around you including and especially your children.
Posted by: Ota | July 19, 2012 at 03:31 AM